The Obama Student Speech: Concern “Silly”?
Tuesday, September 8th, 2009A friend of ours remarked that the tri-color “Hope” poster of candidate Obama reminded him of posters dictators promulgate in public to insure a vision of themselves as great leaders. This being the climate of our times, it is with concern that Christian families faced the prospect of having the President of the United States address their children directly.
The President, of course, dismissed the concerns as “silly.” But there appears to be a legitimate concern and need for vigilance facing Christian families today. The following is a list of why concern was and is warranted:
1. School protocol was not followed with regard to the president’s speech. School boards are elected by their communities and are in charge of what occurs in the classroom. It is the responsibility of these duly elected representatives to oversee all classroom activities. The Obama administration sent the program directly to school administrators, by-passing all school boards.
2. The Obama Administration’s Department of Education prepared responses for the program asking students how they might help support the president. Having the president as the object of support makes the speech political rather than motivational.
3. The National Education Association, a major teachers union, in their July 2009 Representative Assembly in San Diego, passed a resolution in support of same-sex marriage and against employment discrimination based on “sexual orientation and expression.” The resolution read in part, “NEA recognizes that the term ‘marriage’ has religious connotations and that same-sex marriages may not be compatible with the beliefs, values, and/or practices of certain religions.”
In promoting “sexual orientation and expression,” a male transvestite teacher would be encouraged to wear a dress to his classroom.
4. Kevin Jennings is the Assistant Deputy Secretary of the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools. Mr. Jennings is also the co-founder of Gay, Lesbian, Straight Educational Network (GLSEN), a group that promotes forced acceptance of homosexual and transsexuals in schools to children as young as 5 years old.
5. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), last week released its “Guidelines on Sexual Education.” The report calls for teaching masturbation to children as young as 5. It calls for making children as young as 9 years old aware of abortion and its legal status “locally and globally.” At 15-18 years of age, the report encourages instructors to teach “advocacy to promote the right to and access to safe abortion.” UNESCO described the report as age appropriate education.
In our opinion, concern was far from “silly.” Please pray for our children, all those in our education system and please pray for our president.
In the name of Jesus,
Jose Vasquez